Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3, with an 82.7 score against 80. LG G8X ThinQ is a newer device than Google Pixel 3, but it is a little bit thicker and much heavier. LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 has a bit sharper screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
LG G8X ThinQ features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2915mAh. LG G8X ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, they both have the same camera aperture and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG G8X ThinQ, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.