Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 overall score. Even being the best device in this review, it must be noted that it's also a a little bit thicker and a lot heavier device. These phones include Android operating system, but the LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a display that is just as good as LG G8X ThinQ's screen, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a bit higher pixel number in each display inch. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG G8X ThinQ takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a lower video definition and a less mega-pixels back facing camera, they both have a same size aperture and a 0.39 inches sensor.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ costs more money than Google Pixel 3a, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.