Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, with a general score of 82.7 against 78.9. These phones have Android OS, but the LG G8X ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, LG G8X ThinQ is a somewhat heavier and a little thicker cellphone than Google Pixel 3a XL.
LG G8X ThinQ has a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bigger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little greater screen pixels density. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. LG G8X ThinQ features just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 8% larger battery size.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a less mega pixels resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, they both have a same size aperture and a same size camera sensor.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it costs more than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the LG G8X ThinQ, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.