Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 global score. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is a little thinner but just a little heavier than LG G8X ThinQ, and both of them were only released with a few months difference. The LG G8X ThinQ and the Google Pixel 4 XL feature really similar CPUs, they have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little more vivid display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. LG G8X ThinQ takes clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a smaller aperture and a lower resolution back-facing camera, they both have a same size sensor.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8 percent more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G8X ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can get LG G8X ThinQ, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.