Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, with a overall score of 82.9 against 82.7. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, providing some nice extra features. The Google Pixel 4a design is newer, a lot lighter and just a little bit thinner than the LG G8X ThinQ.
The LG G8X ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Google Pixel 4a has a little sharper display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
LG G8X ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a camera in the back with lesser megapixels resolution, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, they both have a same size sensor. The LG G8X ThinQ has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ features greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G8X ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG G8X ThinQ, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.