Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Aurora black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is just a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ's global score of 82.7. The Google Pixel 5 is a newer phone, and it is also just a bit thinner and a lot lighter than the LG G8X ThinQ. Google Pixel 5 and LG G8X ThinQ count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit better display pixel density.
LG G8X ThinQ features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 5, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 5 captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same video definition, the same 60 fps video frame rate and a same size sensor, the Google Pixel 5 also has a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations and a more megapixels camera in the back.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G8X ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG G8X ThinQ, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.