Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora black | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a global score of 82.7, which is slightly better than the Honor 50 Pro's 77 global score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11. Although it's the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it's also older, a little heavier and a little bit thicker.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit better display than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a just a little greater screen density, a little bit larger display and a quite better 1236 x 2676 resolution. The LG G8X ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Honor 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Honor 50 Pro features a better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera. LG G8X ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Honor 50 Pro and LG G8X ThinQ both feature really similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.