Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a global score of 82.7, which is slightly better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 score. The LG G8X ThinQ construction is newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One M9's, although it is also somewhat heavier. These phones work with Android OS, but LG G8X ThinQ has newer 10 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, providing the user a couple additional features.
The HTC One M9 counts with a sharper display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels count per inch of display. HTC One M9 features a bit superior CPU than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bit CPU.
LG G8X ThinQ features a way bigger storage for apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The HTC One M9 has a camera that is just as good as LG G8X ThinQ's camera, because although the HTC One M9 has a tinier aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a way higher resolution camera.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
LG G8X ThinQ costs more than the HTC One M9, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.