Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Aurora black | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is slightly better than LG G8X ThinQ's score of 82.7. The LG K92 is a a little bit heavier cellphone than the LG G8X ThinQ, but both of them are 0.33inches thick. Both devices in this comparison review include the same Android 10 operating system. LG G8X ThinQ has a bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than LG K92. They have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. LG G8X ThinQ and LG K92 feature incredibly similar memory to store more games and applications, both of them have equal internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 counts with a better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
LG K92 features a battery performance that is just as good as the LG G8X ThinQ one.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G8X ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG K92, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G8X ThinQ, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.