Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a global score of 82.7, which is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 global score. The LG G8X ThinQ design is newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a CPU that is very similar to the processor in LG G8X ThinQ, both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and/or video in low light environments, a camera in the back with a way worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more internal memory capacity. LG G8X ThinQ features longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the LG V35 ThinQ.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.