Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 general score. Even though LG Velvet and the LG G8X ThinQ were released with only 7 months difference, LG Velvet is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter. LG G8X ThinQ features a little more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch of screen.
The LG Velvet features as much memory to store more apps and games as the LG G8X ThinQ one, they have a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and exactly the same internal memory capacity. The LG G8X ThinQ has a little faster processor than LG Velvet. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cores. The LG Velvet features a superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The LG Velvet features a bit longer battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has an 8% larger battery capacity.
LG Velvet is more expensive than the LG G8X ThinQ, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.