Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Aurora black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is better than the LG G8X ThinQ's global score of 82.7. LG Wing's body is newer, but a lot heavier and way thicker than the LG G8X ThinQ. These phones include the same Android 10 operating system, so both of them should give all the same operating system features.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a little better processing power than LG Wing, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
The LG Wing features a better storage to store more games and applications than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal storage capacity. The LG Wing captures greater photos and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 60 fps video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG Wing also has a way bigger camera sensor and a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
LG Wing has a battery duration that is very similar to LG G8X ThinQ's battery duration.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G8X ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy LG Wing, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG G8X ThinQ, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.