Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is just a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ's global score of 82.7. The Motorola edge body is thicker but a little bit lighter than LG G8X ThinQ, and both were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a bit higher pixel number in each inch of display. The LG G8X ThinQ features a little better performance than Motorola edge. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Motorola edge counts with a little bit more memory for games and applications than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola edge takes much better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola edge also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Motorola edge counts with just a little bit longer battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G8X ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG G8X ThinQ, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.