Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora black | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 global score. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite construction is newer, a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the LG G8X ThinQ. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a newer 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it offers some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
LG G8X ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. The LG G8X ThinQ has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has superior battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a lot better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with higher video frame rates and a lot higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.