Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora black | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than the LG G8X ThinQ, having a 92.8 score against 82.7. Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than LG G8X ThinQ. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a more recent 12 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, counting with a couple nice extra features.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a display that is just as good as the LG G8X ThinQ one, because although the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better video definition and a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution back camera. LG G8X ThinQ counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.