Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora black | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, with an 83.4 score against 82.7. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version and LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it gives some additional features. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's design is extremely newer, but a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than LG G8X ThinQ.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little bit better looking screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality pictures and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.