Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a general score of 82.7 against 81.9. The LG G8X ThinQ body is incredibly older, a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better screen than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a just a little more pixels per display inch and a quite better 1256 x 2760 resolution. The LG G8X ThinQ features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way bigger sensor and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a much better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features just a bit better battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.