Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than LG G8X ThinQ, getting a global score of 86.3 against 82.7. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a a lot newer phone, and it is also just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG G8X ThinQ. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version and LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a more vivid display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a slightly better memory for apps and games than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a much bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.