Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, getting a global score of 87.1 against 82.7. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is noticeably newer, but just a little heavier and just a little thicker than LG G8X ThinQ. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a little larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a little better battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video, a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a much larger sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.