Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora black | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is slightly better than Moto G Power, getting a overall score of 82.7 against 76.1. These phones come with Android OS, but LG G8X ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Moto G Power has Android 11. Although the LG G8X ThinQ and Moto G Power were released with only a couple of months difference, the LG G8X ThinQ is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a just a bit better pixels quantity in each screen inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The LG G8X ThinQ features just a bit better performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG G8X ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, a lower video quality and a much less MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor. LG G8X ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G Power, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Moto G Power counts with greater battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.