Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Aurora black | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, with a overall score of 86.2 against 82.7. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Moto G200 5G has newer 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10, giving you a couple nice extra features and improved performance. The Moto G200 5G design is noticeably newer, but just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the LG G8X ThinQ.
LG G8X ThinQ features a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density. LG G8X ThinQ has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Moto G200 5G has just a little better performance than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Moto G200 5G has greater battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity. Moto G200 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.