Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 74.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2017-03-31 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is better than the Moto G5 Plus, with an 82.7 score against 74.6. LG G8X ThinQ is a newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Moto G5 Plus, but it is somewhat heavier. The LG G8X ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG G8X ThinQ features a little bit better display than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bigger display. The LG G8X ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited situations and a smaller sensor capturing lower quality photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same resolution camera, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with better video frame rate.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The LG G8X ThinQ features superior battery life than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG G8X ThinQ is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.