Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-11-01 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a overall score of 82.7 against 75.8. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The LG G8X ThinQ design is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Motorola Moto Z Force.
LG G8X ThinQ features a little better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Moto Z Force has just a bit better looking display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a much lower resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a same size aperture.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG G8X ThinQ is also cheaper than the other phone, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.