Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having an 82.7 score against 77.4. Even though the LG G8X ThinQ is notably newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is notably heavier and way thicker. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG G8X ThinQ has a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal memory.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. LG G8X ThinQ takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video definition and a same resolution camera, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments, a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos and better video frame rates.
The LG G8X ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.