Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. LG G8X ThinQ is a way newer cellphone than Moto Z2 Play, although it is noticeably thicker and noticeably heavier. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bigger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each screen inch. LG G8X ThinQ has more memory to install applications and games than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more internal memory capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels back facing camera and the same (4K) video definition, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with better video frame rate.
The LG G8X ThinQ features greater battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
LG G8X ThinQ costs a bit more than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.