Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than the Moto Z3 Play, with a score of 82.7 against 76.3. Even though LG G8X ThinQ is newer than the Moto Z3 Play, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. LG G8X ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a just a little better display density, a bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video quality, a same size sensor and a same resolution back camera, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with higher video frame rate.
LG G8X ThinQ features more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more internal memory. The LG G8X ThinQ features longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG G8X ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.