Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Action's general score of 78.5. Although the LG G8X ThinQ and the Motorola One Action were only released with a few months difference, LG G8X ThinQ's body is just a little bit thinner but also just a little bit heavier.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola One Action and LG G8X ThinQ have extremely similar screens, because although the Motorola One Action has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a little greater count of pixels per inch in the screen.
LG G8X ThinQ has a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same resolution back camera, the LG G8X ThinQ also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate. LG G8X ThinQ has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Action, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ features just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.