Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora black | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper's overall score of 79.8. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but LG G8X ThinQ has an older 10 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. LG G8X ThinQ's body is just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than Motorola One Hyper, even when both of them were released with only 1 months difference.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display. The LG G8X ThinQ has more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola One Hyper features a better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Motorola One Hyper has a battery life that's just as good as LG G8X ThinQ's battery life.
LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.