Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola One Vision, having a general score of 82.7 against 80.7. Although LG G8X ThinQ and Motorola One Vision were released only 6 months apart, the LG G8X ThinQ body is a bit thinner but also just a bit heavier. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM.
Motorola One Vision counts with a screen that is just as good as the LG G8X ThinQ one, because although the Motorola One Vision has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher screen pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution. The Motorola One Vision shoots much better videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a larger camera aperture and a camera with much more megapixels.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ features just a bit better battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.