Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora black | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has an overall score of 82.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom's global score of 80. LG G8X ThinQ's body is a little thinner but just a little bit heavier than the Motorola One Zoom, and both were released only 2 months apart. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have a greater pixel count per screen inch, the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a screen with the same size.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a battery life that is very similar to the battery lifetime in LG G8X ThinQ. Motorola One Zoom has a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos, a larger aperture and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG G8X ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.