Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, getting an 87 score against 82.7. The Motorola razr (2020) body weights the same than LG G8X ThinQ, but it is just a bit thinner. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little larger screen and a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ has a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) captures better pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a bigger aperture, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G8X ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG G8X ThinQ, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.