Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Aurora black | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than Nokia XR20's 80.8 global score. The LG G8X ThinQ design is a lot lighter and much thinner than the Nokia XR20, even though it was released about 21 months before. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11 version.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a little more vivid display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger screen. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Nokia XR20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Nokia XR20. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Nokia XR20 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity. The Nokia XR20 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Nokia XR20 also has a bigger back camera sensor and a way more MP camera in the back.
LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.