Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora black | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having an 82.7 score against 75.8. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the LG G8X ThinQ and nubia Red Magic 3S were released only a few months apart, the LG G8X ThinQ is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit more powerful CPU than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S has superior battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S captures much clearer videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations, a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs, a back camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.