Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 general score. These devices have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Despite of the fact that LG G8X ThinQ is older than the nubia Red Magic 5S, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more vivid display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower display pixels density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bit larger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S and LG G8X ThinQ feature really similar processors, and although the nubia Red Magic 5S has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Nubia Red Magic 5S takes greater videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.