Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora black | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is just a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, getting a global score of 83.1 against 82.7. Although it's the best we compare here, the OPPO Find X2 Pro design is just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than LG G8X ThinQ. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a higher pixel quantity per inch of screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a little larger screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better storage to store more apps and games than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better processing power than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a bigger aperture.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.