Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-01 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a global score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's overall score of 77. The LG G8X ThinQ construction is just a little bit thicker and a little heavier than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better performance than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little sharper screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a bit bigger screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots much better videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a larger camera aperture.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.