Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, getting a general score of 84.6 against 82.7. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's design is newer than LG G8X ThinQ's, but it's just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has newer 11 version and LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, providing the user some nice extra features and performance enhancements.
The LG G8X ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch in the display.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A22 5G has a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a lot higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features superior battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.