Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. LG G8X ThinQ is a a bit lighter device than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but both of them are 0.33inches thick. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8X ThinQ has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly better screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixel density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bit larger screen. LG G8X ThinQ features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality videos and pictures and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot better resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has superior battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.