Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy A30s, having an 82.7 score against 79.8. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the LG G8X ThinQ is an a bit thicker and somewhat heavier device than Galaxy A30s. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but the LG G8X ThinQ has an older 10 version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a lot higher pixels density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and a way less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A30s has a battery duration that is just as good as the battery duration in LG G8X ThinQ.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.