Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, with an 82.7 score against 79.4. Despite of the fact LG G8X ThinQ is older and a little thicker than Galaxy A35 5G, it's body is still a bit lighter. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
LG G8X ThinQ features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy A35 5G features just a bit better looking screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower display pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A35 5G counts with improved battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.