Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than LG G8X ThinQ's score of 82.7. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). Even though the Galaxy A50s and the LG G8X ThinQ were only released with a couple of months difference, the Galaxy A50s is lighter and just a bit thinner.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A50s. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The LG G8X ThinQ features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A50s. Both of them have the same amount of pixels in each screen inch, exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution and a same size display.
The Galaxy A50s features a superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way more MP camera in the back and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
LG G8X ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy A50s feature quite similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.