Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, having a overall score of 85.5 against 82.7. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version and LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10. The Galaxy A51 design is a little thinner and lighter than LG G8X ThinQ, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite worse screen density. LG G8X ThinQ features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A51 has a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much bigger sensor and a much higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A51 counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery lifetime in LG G8X ThinQ.
Although Galaxy A51 is a better device, it costs more money than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G8X ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy A51, else you can save some money and get the LG G8X ThinQ, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.