Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, with a 90.7 score against 82.7. The Galaxy A52 is a just a little lighter phone than LG G8X ThinQ, but they have the same thickness. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a just a bit lower pixel quantity per inch in the display and a little bit smaller display.
LG G8X ThinQ features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A52, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52. They have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit superior battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.