Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than LG G8X ThinQ, with a 91.3 score against 82.7. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and performance improvements. Galaxy A52 5G's design has the same thickness than LG G8X ThinQ, but it is a bit lighter.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A52 5G. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. The LG G8X ThinQ features a little sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little bit worse pixel density and a bit smaller display.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit longer battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.