Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is much better than LG G8X ThinQ's global score of 82.7. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10, so it gives a couple additional features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy A52s's construction has the same thickness than LG G8X ThinQ, but it is just a little lighter.
The LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A52s. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A52s, although it has a little bit worse pixels quantity per inch of screen, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller display.
LG G8X ThinQ features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a bit better battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera and a lot larger sensor capturing way better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.