Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy A6, getting a score of 82.7 against 75.8. Although LG G8X ThinQ is newer than Galaxy A6, it is just a little bit thicker and heavier. The LG G8X ThinQ has a brighter display than Galaxy A6, because it has a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bigger screen and more pixels per inch of display.
LG G8X ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ features a faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG G8X ThinQ has greater battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. LG G8X ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Although LG G8X ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy A6, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.