Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy A70, with an 82.7 score against 76.9. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, it must be told that it is also just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. LG G8X ThinQ has a little better performance than Galaxy A70. They have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little better battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
LG G8X ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.