Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora black | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has a general score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 score. The Galaxy F41 body is newer and a bit lighter than LG G8X ThinQ's, although it's just a little bit thicker. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy F41 has the newer 11 version and LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10, offering some extra features.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy F41. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Galaxy F41 counts with a little sharper display than LG G8X ThinQ. Both of them have the same amount of pixels in each inch in the display, a screen with the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F41, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy F41 shoots much better pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera and a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a superior battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.