Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, having a global score of 88.1 against 82.7. Although the Galaxy F62 is newer than LG G8X ThinQ, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy F62 features a bit better screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The LG G8X ThinQ has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater number of cores. Galaxy F62 counts with a superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 75% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.