Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is better than LG G8X ThinQ, with a 97.6 score against 82.7. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10. Although Galaxy Fold and LG G8X ThinQ were released only a few months apart, Galaxy Fold's body is somewhat thinner but extremely heavier than LG G8X ThinQ.
The Galaxy Fold features a little faster processor than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little better display density.
Galaxy Fold features a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the same 60 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger aperture. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G8X ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG G8X ThinQ, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.